Lensbaby 2.0 with f4 disk. A very prickly customer!
Mel :) In sunny Brisbane, Australia
[melbrackstone.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/26/2005 06:06AM by MelBrackstone.
Prickly botNewer Topic | Older Topic |
||
| Prickly bot posted by MelBrackstone September 25, 2005 03:07PM | reply | quote | |
|---|---|---|
|
posted by
MelBrackstone
|
Lensbaby 2.0 with f4 disk. A very prickly customer!
Mel :) In sunny Brisbane, Australia [melbrackstone.com] Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/26/2005 06:06AM by MelBrackstone. |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by MelBrackstone September 25, 2005 03:14PM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
MelBrackstone
|
And another one. I used a 12mm extension tube for these as well, along with my Canon 20D
Mel :) In sunny Brisbane, Australia [melbrackstone.com] Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/26/2005 06:05AM by MelBrackstone. |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by pkk September 25, 2005 09:14PM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
pkk
|
Nice picture Mel. The Lensbaby effect is very nice. -I think there is a big difference between LBO and LB2.
Which one of them is the most LB/ Holga like, IMO, is the LBoriginal. It's much more soft and "artlookalike". Have you tried your LB without the apeturering? Peter |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by DavidF September 26, 2005 12:01AM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
DavidF
|
Mel, very nice. Is the second image done with 28-135mm lens and not LB? Curious, what camera are you using?
d. |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by MelBrackstone September 26, 2005 06:05AM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
MelBrackstone
|
Yikes, no David, I didn't use the 28-135 for either of these two....I did take a few shots with both lenses though. I'd better edit....lol...I use a Canon 20D
Thanks for your comments Peter and David Peter, I do a lot of work without any aperture disk too, and tend to prefer the softer look, but there certainly is a huge difference between LB 0 and LB 2.0 Mel :) In sunny Brisbane, Australia [melbrackstone.com] |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by archi September 26, 2005 11:39AM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
archi
|
mel,
I like these prickly beauties.. LB softens their prick ... doesnt it ?? ;) @r(hi |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by MelBrackstone September 26, 2005 12:14PM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
MelBrackstone
|
||
| Re: Prickly bot posted by oliver tudoras September 26, 2005 05:23PM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
oliver tudoras
|
both are wonderful ,Mel !
I 'm not a big friend of bot photographie but I like the LB softness in this images very much regards ollie |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by floatingcreeper September 27, 2005 12:14AM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
floatingcreeper
|
i like the perspective and depth in #1. just brilliant. looks like out of a wide angle lens! how are your images so sharp and beautiful ? does your 20D take steroids before you shoot with them ? or do you use disqualified chemicals in your batteries ? what ?
they are awesome, dammit! |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by MelBrackstone September 27, 2005 06:40AM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
MelBrackstone
|
Thank you Ollie and Prabu. I don't have a steroid laden camera, no, and I don't use odd chemicals, I've just taken the road that Uncle Randy suggested, and use the aperture rings more often. I think I used f4, or maybe even f5.6 <blush>
Mel :) In sunny Brisbane, Australia [melbrackstone.com] |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by blam September 27, 2005 12:43PM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
blam
|
Mel,
Very nicely done. Some of my favorite bot shots that have been posted. Thanks for sharing. -d [www.flickr.com] |
|
| Re: Prickly bot posted by MelBrackstone September 28, 2005 06:35AM | reply | quote | |
|
posted by
MelBrackstone
|
||
| Newer Topic | Older Topic | ||